just a thought – fashion’s bluestockings

just a thought — Danielle on April 27, 2009 at 9:40 pm

There is a certain type of woman in fashion who never fails to fascinate me.  She is a fiercely ambitious career woman, intensely creative.  She is surrounded with the trappings of fashion; the luxuries and frills, the fabrics and the shoes, and yet she does not seem to crave fashion for herself.  She dresses in simple clothing and eschews the makeup and the hair stuff.  The intellectual pursuits of fashion – the ideas, the business – are what fascinates her, not the acquisition of things or the indulgence of adornment.

I guess I feel a strong alignment because I feel like I am one of those women in embryo.  I prefer to have a sort of uniform rather than collecting various things and styling myself with them.  I’m not an outfit blogger because my daily outfits are so incredibly monotonous.  Yet I am fascinated with all things fashionable when they are outside of me.  I love the shows and the parties, the politics and the competition, the ideas and the predictions, the history and all the nuances – in short, the intellectual side of fashion is what compels me, not the physical.

The result is I fade to the background amongst the magpies and the models, the socials and the shopgirls.  I like it that way.  It feels right.

The online dictionary defines “bluestocking” as “a woman having literary or intellectual interests”.  You can read the origin of the term hereWikipedia gets into the implications and associations of the term – a bluestocking is not only an intellectual, but a woman who doesn’t dress fashionably or go out of her way to make herself attractive, whether on principle or because she just doesn’t have the inclination.  The stereotypical librarian, in a severe hairdo, conservative clothing and no makeup exemplifies the idea of a bluestocking.

The paradox of a bluestocking in fashion is all the more striking because they are so rare.  For a woman to be powerful in fashion and yet reject its persuasions takes a strong personality.  Here are three of fashion’s most famous bluestockings.

Kelly Cutrone

In person, Ms. Cutrone looked more polished and rested than she ever has on The Hills. She wore Prada heels and head-to-toe black. She has jet-black hair and wears no visible makeup atop her startlingly pale skin, which gives her the look of Wednesday Addams 30 years later. On The Hills, she is drawn and demanding, an East Coast Queen of the Night to Ms. Port and Ms. Conrad’s ditzy blond Californian Princesses.

Vera Wang

“You thought you were meeting a designer,” says Vera Wang. She’s barefoot in the full-floor living room of her Park Avenue apartment, stuffing a Rice Krispies Treat in her mouth. The room is so ornate—all yellow and gold, with a coordinating Monet on the wall—that it looks more like a grandly named suite in a very, very expensive hotel than a home, and Wang, 56 years old but jiggle-free in a pair of tight black leggings, resembles no one so much as Eloise, calling out to her housekeeper for her shearling coat. “I’m actually a little clown,” she says, grabbing the leggings in both hands and yanking them upward.

Alexandra Shulman

I wonder if she gets fed up of everyone casting their eyes over her attire, as they must surely do. After all, if she were the editor of Dentist Weekly, we’d all want to see her teeth.  She says she’s used to it and, anyway, people very quickly lose interest once they realise, “I’m not a clothes horse and have never set myself up to be.”

This is the thing about Shulman. She isn’t Vogue in the way that, say, Diana Vreeland was and Anna Wintour is. She isn’t its bosom-less, French-manicured, divinely dressed, Chanel-scented, Dior-lipsticked embodiment. She isn’t even tanned, fake or otherwise. Indeed, her bare legs are that scary English white.

Can you think of any other fashion bluestockings?

like this post? share it -

    7 Comments »

    1. Dude….I’m a bluestocking. I feel incredibly comforted by having a name attributed to my contradictory interests

      Comment by Cindy — April 27 2009 @ 10:45 pm
    2. Cathy Horyn?

      Comment by Auntie Fashion — April 28 2009 @ 12:56 am
    3. Not sure. Auntie, can you find a paragraph somewhere that seems to confirm Cathy Horyn’s bluestocking status?

      Comment by Danielle — April 28 2009 @ 1:17 am
    4. I second Cathy Horyn.

      “The other night—actually it was very early in the morning—I was at my local Wal-Mart superstore. As some of you may know, I’m a great fan of Wal-Mart’s fashion selection, though I think in recent years it has slumped a little. Anyway, as I was pushing my cart across the floor, I saw in the distance an unusual display and then the name Norma Kamali.”
      http://runway.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/11/19/pioneers-or-one-night-at-wal-mart/
      1. she shops at Wal-Mart
      2. She pays attention to and is enthusiastic about the clothes at Wal-Mart

      Also: http://gawker.com/251432/cathy-horyns-controversial-path-to-heaven
      3. She eats–cookies with bacon fat
      4. She wears a utilitarian black toque to a fashion show

      Comment by Jennifer Campbell — April 28 2009 @ 4:48 pm
    5. Thanks, Jennifer! I guess you did my work for me.

      Comment by Auntie Fashion — April 28 2009 @ 10:09 pm
    6. I like how the Cutrone, Wang, Shulman and Coryn sort of exemplify the four pillars of fashion females besides models. Its very elemental. My guesses:

      Wang: Designer. Fire. Passionate.
      Cutrone: PR. Air. Logical.
      Shulman: Editor: Water. Emotional.
      Coryn: Journalist: Earth. Practical.

      Not sure about some of those assignments but it was fun to guess.

      Wait has anyone done a fashion Tarot yet? I think I have to do this.

      Comment by Danielle — April 28 2009 @ 11:05 pm
    7. I’m going to email you about the fashion tarot.

      Comment by Auntie Fashion — April 29 2009 @ 12:26 pm

    RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

    Leave a comment

    wordpress | barecity | final fashion | © Danielle Meder