the metaculture spiral

thinking — Danielle on January 13, 2013 at 5:41 pm

metaculture

What’s your culture to metaculture ratio? I think I consume about 1:1. To be honest, I don’t understand the academic explanation for metaculture. In my own simple way, I think of metaculture like an eddy formation, where culture turns in on itself like a whirlpool.

Metaculture is when something is about the thing that it is. So like, a movie about making a movie. I saw a gallery show once which was all black paintings. No colour, no narrative, no context, nothing but brushstrokes. The paintings seemed to be about nothing, except the act of making a painting. Or a book that calls attention to itself as a book, like a novel with footnotes. Or a tuxedo t-shirt – trompe l’oeil is nothing but clothes with clothes on. A tweet about tweeting. And so on.

Since metaculture is culture about culture – that also includes criticism, comment threads, panel discussions, blog posts, academic writing, and so on. The culture out there is now so massive and complex, I need help to understand and navigate it all. Sometimes I listen to reviews of books and movies I have no intention of viewing or reading, just so I can feel like I’ve got a handle on the cultural zeitgeist. I’m consuming secondary culture in a primary way.

Metaculture feels necessary and inevitable. It can also feel like a downward spiral. Like a trap. The scary thing about metaculture is that it doesn’t open up possibilities – it shuts them down. For instance, literature about literature is appealing to writers and critics who spend their lives immersed in literature, but totally fails to connect with people outside of that small, rarefied world. While metaculture is often acclaimed within its own sphere, it has little universal appeal. Metaculture sections off and isolates its participants.

This has a homogenizing effect, creating stagnant pools of static culture. I’ve noticed this in personal style blogging, clustered around websites like IFB. Since all of these fashion bloggers are following each other, along with the same set of media outlets, and using the same resources for advice, that particular niche is suffering from a certain pervasive same-ness. This is one of the reasons that my advice to young people interested in fashion is to consume a broad and varied cultural diet (and to be wary of advice). In fashion, there are many people who only take inspiration from within the realm of fashion itself – the result is a dearth of novelty and a certain tone-deafness to the rest of the world.

I think all culture moves in spiral formations. For myself, I am now trying to avoid inward-facing metaculture spirals and move toward spiralling out. There’s something that unites great culture – it takes on the big, universal unknowns – what is this life? Why are we here? The things we all share – love, hate, joy, pain, beauty, death, loss and discovery – that’s where the real stories are. Great culture is inclusive, not exclusive – it offers something any human being can access. There’s something so much more exciting and expansive about culture that attempts to be bigger than itself. Culture about itself delivers diminishing returns – taken to its inevitable conclusion, it becomes absurd.

Another quasi-metaculture trap that seems to trip up female creatives in particular is turning themselves into the subject. How do you make your work bigger than yourself, when the work is yourself? Even as a blogger, I’ve noticed that posts about myself attract much more attention than posts about abstract ideas, or the visual work (where I am not the subject) that I spend most of my time creating. It’s easy to see the temptation to put yourself on display in some way, if it gathers more eyeballs and reactions than anything else. And yet, I resist it, for two reasons. One – just because the mainstream culture rewards women for being contained (or chained) to their physical bodies, doesn’t mean I have to pander to it. Two – because it can turn you into a parody of yourself, quicker than you’d think. The end game is not pretty.

There are so many reasons why we are living in an era of metaculture. We’re still grappling with a new communications technology revolution, so it makes sense that much of what we create is so concerned with the particular devices we’re creating it on. The sheer volume and complexity of culture, now so easily accessible, makes referencing like a medium unto itself – the mash-uppers, the collage artists, the curators – all necessary and interesting developments.

I don’t think metaculture should be feared – even if it does seem like a harbinger of our own end-times. Just as we are consuming the planet until there’s nothing left, perhaps human culture is mirroring that entropy by turning inwards and consuming itself.

like this post? share it -

    7 Comments »

    1. Danielle, you write so well, very engaging and well explained piece. I started reading it knowing nothing about meta culture, and now I do. It reminds me of something I noticed about certain musicians. In particular: Lenny Kravitz. His first album was quite special, songs about love, and his daughter, but then when he was famous, he wrote something called the Rock Circus. Total nonsense. He was simply writing about what he knew, first about a normal life we all recognize, then about being a star, which I totally don’t identify with. Eminem did the same thing. It is, simply lazy.

      A friend of mine once said she thought graduation collections were great as they were often 25 year on the making, after that, you joined the fashion rat race and struggled to stay creative. Similar problems.

      Thanks for the above article, really got me thinking.

      Comment by Simeon — January 13 2013 @ 6:09 pm
    2. Sorry, I meant 25 years in the making. Shouldn’t post without a quick proof read!

      Comment by Simeon — January 13 2013 @ 6:10 pm
    3. Danielle, I wish I had something clever to say in response to your post, but you have said it all so well and much better than I could. Thank you for a great piece. Especially loved your final paragraph. Thinkers have worried that we’ve had all the thoughts there are to think for ages, but that doesn’t mean it isn’t so.

      Comment by Virginia — January 18 2013 @ 7:02 am
    4. [...] Another great post – Another quasi-metaculture trap that seems to trip up female creatives in particular is turning themselves into the subject. How do you make your work bigger than yourself, when the work is yourself? Even as a blogger, I’ve noticed that posts about myself attract much more attention than posts about abstract ideas, or the visual work (where I am not the subject) that I spend most of my time creating. It’s easy to see the temptation to put yourself on display in some way, if it gathers more eyeballs and reactions than anything else. And yet, I resist it. [...]

      Pingback by Interwebby Findings | 21viewsandup.com — January 20 2013 @ 3:26 pm
    5. Ditto on all of the above… enjoyable, intelligent, educational. Your blog is unique and articles like these keep me coming back. Best of luck in your new location! I expect to see great things in years to come.

      Comment by Christy — January 26 2013 @ 12:57 am
    6. This is a fabulous, most wonderfully insightful post. I hope you don’t mind me referencing this in a future post.

      Comment by Joy @ OSS — February 26 2013 @ 12:15 am
    7. Joy – looking forward to reading your post!

      Comment by Danielle — February 26 2013 @ 4:12 pm

    RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

    Leave a comment

    wordpress | barecity | final fashion | © Danielle Meder